Skip to content

FOUR-26562 FIX Process variable, not assigned to the user by its ID #8527

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
ryancooley merged 2 commits into from
Sep 17, 2025
Merged

FOUR-26562 FIX Process variable, not assigned to the user by its ID #8527

ryancooley merged 2 commits into from
Sep 17, 2025

Conversation

@caleeli
Copy link
Contributor

@caleeli caleeli commented Sep 16, 2025 •
edited by ryancooley
Loading

Issue & Reproduction Steps

Assignment by process variable is not working with literal values.

Solution

  • Use FEEL instead of Array::get() to evaluate the assignments.

How to Test

  • Import or create a process with a Task assigned by variable
  • Use a Literal User ID for the assignment, ex: 3
  • Run the process
ProcessVariableAssignment.mov

Attached process:
task_assignment_by_variable.json

Related Tickets & Packages

...

@processmaker-sonarqube
Copy link

processmaker-sonarqube bot commented Sep 16, 2025

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube

@caleeli caleeli changed the title Bugfix/four 26562 FOUR-26562 FIX Process variable, not assigned to the user by its ID Sep 16, 2025
@caleeli caleeli added the 4.15.7 label Sep 16, 2025
@ryancooley ryancooley merged commit f872926 into develop Sep 17, 2025
20 of 28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@danloa danloa danloa approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

4.15.7 failingeks

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@caleeli @danloa @ryancooley